In a striking revelation that’s igniting political debate, former President Donald Trump’s so-called “Crypto Czar” has made headlines by dropping the name of the person he claims was behind the use of President Joe Biden’s autopen — a device used to mechanically sign documents in the president’s name. The claim comes amidst growing scrutiny over President Biden’s cognitive health and the degree of control he exercises over executive decisions.
The Crypto Czar, reportedly a former high-level advisor in Trump’s administration known for his role in shaping digital currency policy, spoke out during a recent podcast interview. Without hesitation, he claimed that a senior White House aide — unnamed in previous reports — was the actual individual managing critical policy signings through Biden’s autopen.
According to the Czar, this aide not only authorized the use of the autopen but also allegedly directed which executive orders were pushed through without direct presidential involvement. “This wasn’t a matter of convenience,” he said. “This was a matter of control. The person behind Biden’s autopen has been acting as a shadow president.”
The name he dropped — Jeffrey Zients, White House Chief of Staff — has long been seen as one of Biden’s closest confidants. The allegation is that Zients, given his deep access to Biden and command over daily operations, orchestrated several autopen-authorized executive orders during periods when the president was reportedly unavailable or unwell.
Critics argue that the use of an autopen isn’t unusual. Historically, it’s been deployed by presidents for logistical efficiency, especially when traveling. However, the Crypto Czar insists this case was different. He claimed there were “multiple instances” where Biden was not briefed or directly aware of orders that were issued under his name.
Republicans are now demanding transparency. Some are calling for a Congressional investigation into executive order protocols. Others see the revelation as a political opportunity, further questioning Biden’s capacity to lead.
Democrats, meanwhile, are dismissing the claim as a baseless distraction, meant to divert attention from the legal troubles facing Trump and several of his allies. They argue that autopen use is a mundane procedural matter being blown out of proportion by political operatives.
Still, the timing of the allegation is significant. With the 2024 election season heating up and questions surrounding presidential authority gaining traction, the assertion adds fuel to partisan narratives on both sides. The Crypto Czar, now a media figure with a growing following, promises more disclosures in the coming weeks — possibly related to digital currencies, government surveillance, and election security.
As the political world digests this explosive claim, the broader issue remains: who truly holds the reins of executive power when the president steps out of the spotlight? For now, the name behind Biden’s autopen has only deepened the mystery and widened the partisan divide.
